Skip to main content
River Rwizi Charity Conservation
Donate

Results

Impact

What has changed, how we know, and where we have fallen short. Every figure carries the date it was measured and whether it has been verified.

Numbers without provenance are marketing. Every figure below says when it was measured and whether anyone outside this organisation has checked it.

Bank replanted
6.4 kmMeasured: Surviving at twelve months. Field count, June 2026.
Seedlings planted
11,200Measured: Since 2022. Survival at twelve months averages 61%.
People trained
1,840Measured: Individuals, not attendances. Field count, June 2026.
Monitoring points
6Measured: Sampled quarterly since 2023.
  • Measured: Measuredcounted by us, in the field
  • Cited: Citedpublished elsewhere, cited here
  • Indicative: Indicativean approximation, not a measurement

Seedling survival at twelve months, by planting cohort

The number that decides whether a planting day meant anything. We publish it beside the planting total, always — quoting one without the other overstates the work by roughly 60%.

65% or betterBelow 65%Total loss
The dashed line is the twelve-month average across completed cohorts, 61%. The 2023 dry-season cohort is a total loss: 900 seedlings at Nyakayojo, planted after agreeing with the landowner but without speaking to the household actually farming the land. It stays on the chart. The newest cohort is a six-month count and is excluded from the average until its year is up.Source: Own field counts on sample transects, 2022 to 2026-06-30. Sample data.

Bank replanted and surviving

Cumulative kilometres with buffer planting still alive at twelve months. Not the length we planted — the length that held.

Source: Own field records, 2022 to 2026-06-30. Sample data.

Three of those four are internal estimates

They come from our own field records and have not been externally audited. We publish them because withholding them would be worse, not because they are beyond question. When the first external audit is complete this page will say which figures it covered.

Why we lead with survival, not planting

It is common to see a conservation organisation report the number of trees planted. That number is easy to generate and tells you almost nothing: it describes one day of activity, not a living outcome.

Our twelve-month survival rate is 61%. Reporting 11,200 planted without that figure would present our work as roughly 60% more effective than it is. So the two numbers travel together, always.

The same logic applies to training. We count individuals rather than attendances, because an organisation reporting attendances can multiply its figures by running more meetings for the same twenty people.

Hold us to these numbers

If a figure on this site looks wrong to you, say so. We will check it and correct it publicly rather than quietly.